Sunday marked the end of the most successful regular season in Boston Red Sox history. They won their final game against the New York Yankees at Fenway Park. Several weeks ago, when it looked like the Yankees were going to make a pennant race of it to the end, I surprised my Red Sox fan wife with two tickets to the game that I was amazed to be able to obtain.

I was in Fenway in 1967 when the Impossible Dream ended with a pennant and a trip to the World Series. The possibility of seeing a rerun of that finish, 51 years later, against the Yankees of all teams, was too good to pass up.

As we all know, and as I predicted from the beginning of the season, the Red Sox walked away from the Yankees and the pennant race is long over. My youngest son Steve and my 10 year old Grandson Nick enjoyed the game in my seats.

The Sox go into the Playoffs with the best record in baseball. You would think, as most Red Sox fans do, after such an amazing season, that they would probably win it all easily.

Before you begin the celebration in anticipation of the World Series victory, let’s look at some sobering facts.

Since 2000, a period of 18 years, the team that had, or was tied for, the best record in baseball at the end of the regular season has won the World Series just four times. Four other times in those 18 years, the team with the best regular season in baseball has gotten to but lost the World Series.

Five times the team with the best record in the regular season has made it to but been eliminated in the League Championship Series, the last step before the World Series. If those facts are not sobering enough, on 10 occasions, the team with the best record in all of baseball in the regular season has not even gotten through the first round of the Playoffs, the Division Series. ( In that period, five times two teams tied for the most wins in all of baseball, making 23 teams, with the best record, that made it to the Playoffs in 18 years. )

In 2014, just four years ago the San Francisco Giants beat the Kansas City Royals in the World Series. The Giants had a regular season record of 88-74 and the Royals were 89-73 and both made it to the Playoffs as a Wild Card. After winning the Wild Card game to get into the Division Series they had the worst records of all the teams in the Playoffs yet both made it to the Big Dance.

While it appears that there is no correlation between having the best regular season record and winning the World Series, there are a few historical facts that may indicate that the 2018 Boston Red Sox might have a better chance of going all the way than others teams with the best regular season record have had.

Of the four teams with the best records that went on to win the World Series, two of the four, the 2007 and 2013 winners were the Red Sox. The others to beat what you might call the ‘ Best Record Curse ‘ were the 2009 Yankees and the 2016 Chicago Cubs.

The Red Sox, of course, have won the World Series three times in this 18 year period, two of those times, in 2004 and 2013, they were managed by Managers in their first year at the helm of the team, Terry Francona in 2004 and John Farrell in 2013. This year’s version, with the most wins in the regular season, is managed by another first year Manager Alex Cora.

( If you don’t count the Stamford, Connecticut, dancer who posed as the Red Sox Manager in 2012, Bobby, Look At Me, Valentine, the last three real Red Sox Managers have won the pennant in their first season at the helm and Cora has a chance to be the third in succession. )

The Red Sox won the first four World Series they played in in the 20th century as the Red Sox going all the way in 1912, 1915, 1916 and 1918 in succession. ( The Boston Americans, the original version of the Red Sox won the first World Series ever played in 1903 but didn’t become the Red Sox until 1908. )

They have been in three World Series since the start of the 21st century and have won three straight. Perhaps history will repeat itself and they will have their fourth World Series win of this century, 100 years after winning their fourth of the previous century.

There is almost no correlation between winning the regular season championship and getting to and winning the World Series. For example, a team needs a deep starting pitching rotation to compete over the long season where a team can get by with three or four starters in the short series in the Playoffs. A hot streak can carry a weak team in the Playoffs, where the long season will tend to eliminate that weak team.

As we anxiously await the start of the Playoffs, it’s important to keep in mind that the old adage, ‘ The cream will come to the top ‘ may be true in the long regular season but, more often that not has not been true in the Playoffs.

But ‘ Hold on to your hats ‘ Red Sox fans, it’s going to be a wild ride and let’s hope the Sox can do it. They have certainly given us reason to believe in them but, as they also say “ Expect the Best and Prepare for the Worst ‘.

Go Sox!!!!



The phrase ‘ The whole is greater than the sum of its parts’, often attributed to Aristotle, was explained in on March 17, 2014 as meaning ‘ when individual parts are connected together to form one entity, they are worth more than if the parts were in silos ‘.

The May 22, 2012 ‘Strategies Newsletter’ produced by T. E. Wealth, related the concept to sports when they said ‘First coined by the philosopher Aristotle, this phrase aptly defines the modern concept of synergy. For anyone who has played team sports, it echoes the T.E.A.M. acronym—together, everyone achieves more.’

The 2018 Boston Red Sox are the perfect example of a whole being greater than the sum of its parts. Mookie Betts, J. D. Martinez, Chris Sale and Company is, for the most part, a collection of mostly average with a few exceptional baseball players none of which, with the possible exception of Betts and Sale, will ever be enshrined in the Baseball Hall of Fame. Taken separately, there is nothing to distinguish this group of players from others that have had winning seasons.

Yet, they have put together one of the most successful seasons the game has ever seen. It is entirely possible that the team may not be, as Sale said a couple of weeks ago, ‘The greatest team ever to walk the planet’. However, this team has to rank up there with the best of them.

The USA Today, in an article about the best teams in each individual franchise’s history, named the 1927 Yankees, with Murderer’s Row, the best team in Yankee franchise history. That team won 110 and lost 44, and swept the Pittsburgh Pirates in the World Series. They had Earl Coombs, Lou Gehrig, Babe Ruth, Waite Hoyt, Tony Lazzeri and Herb Pennock all of whom are in the Hall of Fame.

They said the 1976 Cincinnati Reds ‘Big Red Machine’, that won 102 and lost 60 and swept the Yankees in the World Series was the best that franchise had ever produced. Manager Sparky Anderson, Joe Morgan, Johnny Bench and Tony Perez, from that team, are all in the Hall of Fame and they also had Pete Rose, who everybody knows had the numbers to be there.

The USA Today article picked the 1912 Red Sox as the best team in their franchise history. That team won 105 and lost 47 and beat the New York Giants 4-3 (with one tie) in the World Series. That team had Hall of Famers, Harry Hooper and Tris Speaker and pitcher Smokey Joe Wood won 34 and lost 5 with a 1.91 ERA. USA today also said that the 2004 Red Sox team, which won 98 and lost 64 but swept the Cardinals in the World Series might have been the best of the Red Sox with future Hall of Famer Pedro Martinez and probable future Hall of Famer David Ortiz.

This year’s version of the Red Sox, with a day to day lineup, with 12 games left in the season, that included Jackie Bradley, hitting.232, Eduardo Nunez, .262, Sandy Leon,

.182 and Mitch Moreland at .246, certainly doesn’t compare with Murderer’s Row or the Big Red Machine on paper. Of course they also had Mookie Betts at .337, leading the world, J. D. Martinez at .328 with 41 homers and 122 RBI’s, Xander Bogaerts, .288, Andrew Benintendi, .287 and Ian Kinsler at .283.

As a team, they led all of baseball in batting average, .267, runs scored, 799, doubles, 323, on base percentage, .337 and slugging percentage, .450. Their pitching had the fifth best ERA and the third best in the American League at 3.64.

This team was a cohesive unit prior to this year. Betts, Bogaerts, Bradley, the nucleus of the unit, are young players committed to winning and the Sox have done that over the past few years. In addition to their World Series wins in 2004, 2007 and 2013, they have won the Eastern Division the last three years. Alex Cora was exactly the type of leader this group needed.

Much credit belongs with Dave Dombrowski for filling the holes in the roster with players that, for the most part, fit the mold of the nucleus. There have been some mistakes over Dombrowski’s term but there have also been great moves like the additions of Steven Pearce, Ian Kinsler, Eduardo Nunez and the jettisoning of Hanley Ramirez that have strengthened the unit.

The addition of J. D. Martinez, although no one could have anticipated it would have such a wide ranging effect, was a big key to this year’s success. He provided the veteran, stable, committed presence that is more responsible for this year’s success than anything else in addition to improving the offensive production.

The credit for this unbelievable season, belongs with the Ownership Group, led by John Henry. While I have not always agreed with everything they have done, they put Dombrowski and Cora in place and had final approval on the changes made to strengthen this team. Red Sox Nation is a proud place to live this year and their leadership is ultimately responsible for that.

Who knows exactly what it is that makes a group of players as effective as the Red Sox have been this year while, down in New York, the Yankees team, that appeared to be poised to begin another dynasty, falls apart? Aristotle never heard of baseball or the Red Sox but he hit the nail on the head with this one.

Let’s hope that the synergy or chemistry that has made the Red Sox better than the sum of its parts continues through the playoffs and World Series.



The weekend before last, baseball had Players’ Weekend. The Major League Baseball Players were allowed to wear their nickname, instead of their surname, on the backs of their uniforms. They were also allowed to decorate their baseball shoes as they saw fit. ( I assume their were some restrictions on both the shoes and shirts to ensure that no minority would be offended by the sight of the name or the decorations.)

Major League Baseball has been doing this to allow the player’s to express themselves and, as Antony Castrovince reported on the MLB web site on August 23d ‘It’s an opportunity for fans to get a little wider window into the personalities of the players.’

More accurately expressed, by me here, It’s Major League Baseball’s latest misguided attempt to make baseball more attractive to its supposedly dwindling fan base.

In addition, players were allowed to wear decorated or different colored batting gloves, wristbands, compression sleeves, catcher’s masks, and bats and each uniform had a patch on the sleeve where a player could write the name of a person who aided their career. The jerseys and other equipment were auctioned after the weekend to raise money for the players charities.

As Castrovince went on to say, ‘This is the game’s embrace of individuality, charisma and creativity’. Can you imagine being a Major League Baseball player, making anywhere from the minimum salary of $545,000. to $23 million or more a year, standing in the batter’s box or on the pitcher’s mound almost every day in front of 20-50,000 people in the stands and hundreds of thousands more on television, all focused on you, and still having a need to express your individuality?

Aside from the contribution to charity made through the auction, it is hard for me, as a baseball fan to understand how anyone, except possibly the players, benefit from this annual fiasco. The fact that it occurs during the final weeks of the season, when the pennant races are heating up and players don’t need another distraction makes it even more ridiculous to me.

As Castrovince went on to say, this weekend and ‘the vibrant, non-traditional alternate uniforms,…., were inspired by uniforms you would typically see in Little League, tying into the theme of the youth involvement that Commissioner Rob Manfred has invested in since taking office ahead of the 2015 season.’

Somebody should tell that Idiot in the Commissioners’ Office that those youths that he is trying to attract to the game DON’T COME TO THE GAME ALONE. They come with parents, grandparents or other adults who want to see the game themselves and, therefore, want to have their kids, grandchildren, etc., enjoy the game as they did as kids. If the adults are not interested enough to come themselves, the kids will not get there.

As someone once said about the economy, it’s the demographic stupid. Does he expect that the kids will run away from home and spend money they don’t have to buy a ticket so they can go to the game alone. Baseball’s challenge is not to attract the younger generation to the game. Baseball’s challenge is to entice the adults to bring the younger generation to the game. Once they are in the ballpark, the game will attract them to come back.

Promotions like every child under 12 gets in for $5. with an adult admission on select dates will do that. And, once they’re in the ballpark, kids will generate as much, if not more, in concessions sales than adults do. A good number of the ball parks are half full anyway, why not fill those empty seats with kids and develop future customers?

Give the adults back the entertaining game that I watched as a kid because my father loved the game and the kids will come to the game, with the adults. Give them the Lou Pinellas and Billy Martins arguing with the umpires over a bad call instead of sterile conferences of umpires waiting for a call from New York to say whether the call was accurate or not.

Give them collisions at home plate and at second base where players protected themselves on their own before the rules were changed and the bases clearing brawls that happened when Pedro Martinez or some other head hunter decided a player needed a closer shave. Take away the shifts that are the main reason we have so many home runs and strikeouts instead of hit and run plays, stolen bases and bunts.

Do they really think that football would be more attractive to fans if they did away with the bone crushing tackles and instead had to pull a flag out of the ball carrier’s belt? Professional sports are entertainment at its best and, like Oklahoma would be without music, baseball is being hurt by its reduction in entertainment value.

Enough complaining. HOW ABOUT THOSE RED SOX? At the close of play on Thursday, they were 97-44 after a sensational sweep of the National League East’s leading Atlanta Braves. After a brief slowdown, the juggernaut was rolling again.

The biggest problem the Red Sox have the rest of the way, is deciding who among the position players is not going to make the team. Assuming they need to carry at least 12 or 13 pitchers, they have a minimum of 12 and a maximum of 13 slots for position players.

Anything can happen between now and Playoff time but, as it stands right now, Sale, Price, Rodriguez and Porcello should be the four starters with, of course, Kimbrel as the Closer. That leaves seven or eight slots for relievers. Eovaldi, Kelly, Barnes, Brasier, Workman, Wright, Velazquez and Johnson would be my choices if they go with eight with Thornburg and Pomeranz left off the roster.

Picking the the 12 position players looks easy to me. The two catchers would be Leon and Vazquez, with Moreland, Pearce, Bogaerts, Nunez and Holt as infielders and Betts, Bradley, Benintendi and Martinez in the outfield with Holt also available to back up in the outfield when needed. As much as I like Swihart, I cannot see him making the roster in place of a pitcher and, as committed as the Sox are to Devers’ future, the same is true of him.

We are still three weeks from the Yankees at Fenway for the last game of the season, so anything can happen. If the team I would name to the Playoff roster stays healthy, Alex Cora is going to be the second Red Sox first year Manager to win a World Series in the last six years.




The Red Sox were able to come back on Tuesday and stop their second straight three game losing streak before it became their first four game losing streak. At the time, they were the only team in baseball without a streak of at least four consecutive losses. Much had been made over the fact that the 1903 and 2013 Red Sox were the only Red Sox teams ever to go a season without a four game losing streak and both had won the World Series that year.

On Tuesday, they had come from behind, against the lowly Miami Marlins, after being ahead early, to score three in the bottom of the eight and forge ahead again 7-6. With Craig Kimbrel coming in to pitch the ninth, Red Sox fans figured the game was all wrapped up. Kimbrel proceeded to allow the Marlins to score the tying run on two walks and a single, blowing his fifth save of the year.

Of course, the Sox then got one in the bottom of the ninth to win the game 8-7. Despite blowing the save and almost causing the Sox to lose their fourth in a row, Kimbrel was the beneficiary of J. T. Riddle’s error that cost the Marlins the win.

When the Sox came right back in the last of the ninth to win the game in walk off fashion, albeit on an error, Kimbrel, having pitched last for the Sox, was the pitcher of record and therefore, after blowing the lead he had come in to protect, he got credit for the win. Kimbrel, at that point, had had a magnificent season with 37 saves, a 2.55 ERA and 81 strikeouts in 53 innings but he was terrible on Tuesday night.

This is the second time this month that Kimbrel has blown a save and gotten credit for the win when the winning run was scored after he had pitched his one inning. On August 7th, he came on in the ninth against the Toronto Blue Jays with a 5-4 lead and blew the save, giving up a homer to Justin Smoak, tying the score and sending the game into extra innings. When the Sox got five in the top of the tenth to win and, even though Tyler Thornburg relieved him in the last of the tenth, Kimbrel got the win to go with his blown save.

This occurs throughout baseball all the time, not just to Kimbrel and the Red Sox, but that does not make it fair or right. It just doesn’t seem right that a pitcher should fail miserably and still get credit for the win but that’s the rule and this type of inequity occurs regularly. Why not allow the official scorer to award the win to the most deserving pitcher when this happens? After all, the scorer makes judgment calls between hits and errors during a game all the time.

Wouldn’t it be more equitable to give the win to Brandon Workman, who pitched 1 2/3 scoreless innings in relief and left with the Sox ahead 3-1, or Brian Johnson, the reliever who started the game and gave up only one run in 4 1/3 innings and left ahead 3-1?

( You certainly couldn’t give it to Matt Barnes, who gave up three runs on four hits in 1/3 an inning after coming in with a 4-1 lead and leaving with the score tied 4-4.)

While I’m on the subject of inequities in baseball, how about the unwritten rule that says if an outfielder misjudges a ball allowing it to fall without being touched there is no error? How many balls have you seen that should have been routine outs that fell for a double or triple because an outfielder started in on a ball that then went over his head for a triple? Eduardo Nunez got an inside the park homer on opening day this year on such a play. He got awarded a homer on a ball that should have been caught by Tampa Bay center fielder, Kevin Kiermaier and didn’t even roll as far as the wall and Nunez came all the way around to score. Rays’ pitcher Chris Archer had a homer and two earned runs added to his statistics because of this misplay. Again, why not let the common sense of the official scorer determine if it was a hit or an error.

And how about the scoring rule that says you can’t anticipate a double play in scoring? On the play that ended the game Tuesday night, Nunez grounded to Riddle at short who tagged the bag for the force but his throw to first went wild allowing Martinez to score the winning run. If Martinez had not been at third and scored, the terrible throw that Riddle made would not have been charged as an error even if Nunez would have been out easily on a good throw.

Because Martinez advanced a base on the wild throw there was an error charged but, if he had thrown wild with no runner on third and Nunez had stopped at first, there would have been no error charged. Again, substituting the scorer’s judgment for the ridiculous rule would be fairer to all involved, especially in the age of instant replay where the scorer can easily determine if the runner would have been out or safe without the error.

These three situations are easily fixed and would make the records more accurately reflect what happened in a game and would penalize or reward the responsible defensive player while accurately reflecting what the offensive player did.

While the Baseball Gods are considering my suggestions, they might think about charging a pitcher with a walk when he hits a batter, after all they have the same result and it would accurately show how many times a pitcher allowed a batter to reach base without putting the ball in play.

Enough of my rant about my pet peeves for today. In my former work life, when asked why we did something we did the way we did, we would say it was anthropological, we do it that way because we always did it that way. I am reasonably sure they will be doing it all the same way 100 years from now.


Over the Fourth of July Holiday and the subsequent weeks, we have had a constant stream of relatives visiting and staying in our home. I don’t mean anything negative by

that as we truly enjoy the company and are sorry to see them go, most of the time.

Extra people means extra consumption and extra consumption means more waste and items to dispose of. As a result, we found that between regular collection days, we had accumulated enough to require an extra visit to the City of Sanford Transfer Station. I packed everything up and headed off to do my duty.

While there, I ran into an acquaintance and we discussed, naturally, baseball in general and those amazing Red Sox in particular. On the way home from the Transfer Station, I got to thinking about the way our society has ‘softened’ our language. The place I had just visited was the ‘dump’ for the first fifty years of my life, then began to be called things like the ‘Refuse Recovery Area’ and now is the ‘Transfer Station’. (George Carlin would have had fun with that wouldn’t he?)

We don’t use kleenex anymore, we use ’tissue’, the people that sell you this tissue are not clerks but ‘sales associates’ and the people in public buildings that dispose of the waste tissue are not janitors but ‘Maintenance Specialists’. I could go on and on but the point of this article is to recognize the fact that baseball is an island in this sea called the ‘Gentrification of our Language’.

When it seems that every day a word has to be removed from our vocabulary because it might offend somebody or may have offended somebody years ago, the language of baseball has basically remained unchanged for the almost 200 years it has been played.

We still use words and terms like ‘stolen base’ even though that might be offensive to someone whose house was robbed or was the victim of another type theft. As far as I know, no one in, or from, Texas is offended by the fact that a Texas Leaguer is a kind of weak, often lucky, hit, that falls between fielders.

No one has started a movement to change ‘double play’ or worse yet ‘twin killing’ to a ‘multiple out event’ or some other more politically correct term. And, the only person I know who ever objected to the term ‘bunt’ or the act of bunting was C. C. Sabathia when he felt it was being unfairly used against him.

Even though the term foul has a negative connotation in everyday life, baseball still uses it to denote the area outside the baselines as ‘foul territory’ or a ball hit in that area as a ‘foul ball’. Even the most sensitive among the language cleaner uppers don’t consider those terms ‘foul language’.

Even though those helicopter little league parents still refuse to recognize that their darling has struck out and still call a strikeout a ‘nice try’ or ‘good job’, the rest of baseball still recognizes that a strike out is not a good outcome but a ‘grand slam’ is as good as it gets.

How about a ‘bean ball’ or ‘high hard one’? Obviously, the word changers would never acknowledge that someone might throw at another person on purpose so it would have to be changed to ‘an inadvertent near miss’.

And how about those nicknames. You couldn’t say ‘Shoeless Joe’ Jackson, for fear of stigmatizing poor Joe. George ‘Shotgun’ Shuba’s nickname would have been removed as too violent by the same people whose kids play those ‘shoot ’em up’ video games all day.

And poor Jim Grant, the fact that he was called ‘Mudcat’ because he was as ugly as a Mississippi Mudcat, would drive the language changers crazy.

Can you imagine the outrage if brothers, two of the best pitchers in baseball, were called Dizzy and Daffy? There would be Congressional Hearings and threats to shut down the game. Carlton Fisk or Ivan Rodriguez never objected to the nickname ‘Pudge’ but these people could see a whole class of citizens locking themselves in their rooms for weeks if they even heard the term.

Then there was ‘Wee Willy’ Keeler who would be the poster child these days for discrimination against vertically challenged people and Mordecai Brown’s nickname ‘Three Finger’ would be cause for rioting in the streets.

Of course the term ‘homer’ is close enough to ‘Homey’ to be confused and could cause distress to any number of minorities or majorities depending upon your location and orientation.

They have attacked names like the Indians and the Braves as being offensive to Native Americans, surely the ‘Bronx Bombers’ must offend someone and be changed to ‘Long Hitters’ or some other euphemism.

How about the potential damage to a player’s psyche if he were called a ‘banjo hitter’ or a ‘Punch and Judy’ hitter, terms used regularly to denote a hitter with little power?

So far, despite the rules preventing collisions and the instant replay that eliminates those unseemly arguments with names being called and dirt kicked, baseball has avoided the gentrification movement. Wait until they decide that, in our kinder, gentler society, it’s unfair to make those weaker hitters bat at the bottom of the order and start to petition for better treatment for them.

Believe me, they’ll get to it yet and someday in the future a team as bad as this year’s Baltimore Orioles or Kansas City Royals will be awarded a Participation Trophy.


We have all heard the old saying that ‘ the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree, meaning, according to the Cambridge dictionary, that ‘a child usually has a similar character or similar qualities to his or her parents.’

Often, the child of a school teacher becomes a school teacher, the accountant’s kids become accountants, etc.. In the case of my family, for example, my brother and I were both Police Officers, two of my sons became Police Officers and a Grandson just received his Bachelor’s Degree in Criminal Justice and is beginning a law enforcement career.

Of course, there is the old argument over nature versus nurture, the accountant’s child who has no natural interest or ability in math, will probably never be an accountant but the odds are pretty good that the accountant’s son who is a math whiz, who is also exposed to the world of accountants, will end up in that field.

In the baseball world, there have been many examples of children following in their fathers’ footsteps. Cal Ripkin, Jr. and Sr., come to mind, as do the Ken Griffey, Jr. and Sr. and Bobby Bonds and Barry Bonds, to name a few.

For a baseball player to make it to the Major Leagues requires a tremendous amount of physical ability which allows those players to work hard and home those skills to a level that allows them to perform effectively on the big stage. Obviously, there must be some genetic transfer of things like eye/hand coordination, exceptional vision, speed of foot and hand, etc., etc., etc. In addition, young children of Major Leaguers are exposed to the life and rewards of playing Major League baseball, receive instruction and encouragement from their Big League Dads and sometimes their Big League Brothers.

Still, only a very small percentage of those players in the Major Leagues come from families with Major League experience. The Boone family, with Grandfather Ray, his son Bob and his sons Aaron and Ray are one example of a multi-generational baseball family.

The Toronto Blue Jays have put together a unique group of players in their AA, New Hampshire Fisher Cats organization who play in the Eastern League and were in Portland to face the Sea Dogs this past week. The third baseman on that team is Vladimir Guerrero, Jr. As of Wednesday of this week, Vladimir was hitting .426 in 47 games for the Fisher Cats and had hit 11 home runs and driven in 53 runs in that 47 games. He was on a 10 game hitting streak in which he had hit .500 with 19 hits in 38 at bats.

In case you don’t recognize the name, he is the son of Vladimir Guerrero who was elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame this year after a 16 year career, in which he played for four different teams, averaged .318, hit 449 home runs and drove in 1,496 runs. He won the American League Most Valuable Player Award in 2004 when he hit .337 with 39 homers and 126 RBI’s. The younger Guerrero, who will be promoted to Toronto in the near future, was signed as a Free Agent for $3.9 million at the age of 16 and hit .323 in Class A last year.

The shortstop on that Fisher Cats team is 20 year old Bo Bichette, son of Dante Bichette, who played 14 seasons in the Major Leagues for five different teams, including a year and a half with the Red Sox and had a career batting average of .299. In 1995, Dante led the America League in hits with 197, homers, 40, runs batted in 128 and finished second in the MVP balloting. He was a four time All Star. Bo was hitting .269 through his first 48 games with the Fisher Cats and last year, in A ball, batted .362 in 110 games with 14 homers and 74 runs batted in.

In addition, Bo’s brother Dante, is the third baseman with the Trenton Thunder in the Eastern League and was hitting .270 through Wednesday.

The second baseman on the Fisher Cats is a 23 year old named Cavan Biggio, son of Craig Biggio who, in a 20 year career as one of the Killer Bees, with the Houston Astros, batted .281 with 291 homers and 1,175 runs batted in and was a seven time All Star. Cavan hit .308 with 12 homers and 40 runs batted in in his first 47 games this year since being promoted from Dunedin in the Florida State League to start the season.

The Fisher Cats have a unique situation in that three of their starting infielders are the children of prominent former Major League players, but it could get better.

The first baseman for the Dunedin team, the Blue Jays entry in the Florida State League is a young man named Kacy Clemens, son of Roger Clemens, who just happens to have been one of the best pitchers in all of baseball. I don’t have to quote his statistics to Red Sox fans but his son Kacy was hitting .222 with Dunedin in his first 19 games at A ball.

If Kacy should get promoted to the Fisher Cats before Toronto decides they need one of the other three at the Major League level, it could mark the first time in baseball history that an entire infield has been made up of sons of former prominent Major Leaguers.

The Fisher Cats will entertain the Sea Dogs at Manchester’s New England Delta Dental Stadium for four games from June 25th to 28th and will come to Portland for four games from July 12th to 15th. A chance for local fans to see this unique infield at work.


Red Sox fans are concerned about Drew Pomeranz who started the season on the disabled list and has not looked like the Drew Pomeranz who finished the season 17-6 for the Sox last year.

In his first eight starts since coming off the disabled list, he has won one game and lost three, has a 6.81 earned run average, giving up 28 earned runs in just 37 innings. In the meantime, Steven Wright has been in nine games in relief, giving up just four earned runs in 16 innings for an ERA of 2.25.

Should the Sox replace Pomeranz in the starting rotation with Wright? Remember, as a starter, before injuring his shoulder, Wright won 13 and lost six with a 3.33 ERA in 2016.

Looking back at 2017, Pomereanz, in his first eight starts of the season, won three and lost three, with a 4.97 ERA and, for the rest of the year, looked like a different pitcher and was 14-3 with a 2.85 ERA. It may be too early to think about replacing him in the rotation but the Sox will have to bite that bullet in the near future if he continues to under perform.